Blog

Rajendra Family Court Law Firm engage in negotiations on a daily basis in both our personal and professional life. Persuasive negotiation strategies are crucial as a result. They are particularly crucial for attorneys because, considering that 95% of cases settle before trial, they must often bargain at some time during the litigation process. Negotiating Family Court Lawyers
typically use a variety of negotiating stances while seeking a settlement. Some people believe that approaching these discussions using distributive fixed-pie bargaining will be beneficial. With this strategy, Negotiating Family Court lawyers frequently engage in a push-and-pull type of negotiation in which they adopt strong stances and seek to extract as much money from the adversary as possible as settlement money for their clients. In distributive bargaining, a Rupee won by one side results in a Rupee lost by the other.

Attorneys for successful Negotiation

Other Attorneys for Negotiation might think about using a facilitation, integrative negotiation strategy in which they metaphorically try to increase the pie by getting to the bottom of why the other party is putting out certain viewpoints. To come up with original ideas, they then look for areas where their interests overlap or can be traded off. This method of negotiation enables remedies that cannot be reached by a court decision, such as ribbon-cutting celebrations, joint press releases, future commercial relationships, repairs of flawed goods, fulfillment of contractual responsibilities, and similar things. Last but not least, other Successful Negotiating Attorneys use a flexible blend of techniques, frequently beginning with positional distributive bargaining and transitioning to integrative bargaining to resolve potential negotiation deadlocks.