Blog

CMA 862/2017 Divya vs Elangovan, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred against the order dated 10.11.2016, passed in F.C.No.327 of 2015, on the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu. It is true that on the side of the respondent, no evidence is available and even respondents have not been examined. However, the court must carefully analyze the evidence given by the Petitioner. As Supra mentioned, the Petitioner has received everything that was put forward on the side of the respondent. In short, the applicant has provided cons evidence of the average made in the petition. Because the Petitioner himself has honestly recognized the effect that he voluntarily went to the clerk’s office along with the respondent and because he acknowledged the alleged marriage between him and the respondent, the court could be very well assuming that their marriage had been carried out in accordance with that provisions section 7- A from Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Because the court can be very elegant with a strong allegation that marriage between the Petitioner and the respondent has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the section, it is not necessary to be expressed as Null and Void.