The Apex Court reiterated that Any Criminal complaint must be quashed if if offence is not made out by a thorough reading of the complaint.
When the complaint itself reveals nothing more than a commercial relationship which is desolved, it is impossible to enlarge the scope of his complaint by just including the language applied in the text of the Indian Penal Code, the bench comprising Justices V. Ramasubramanian & Indira Banerjee observed.
In this case, A complaint private was filed a under Section 200 Cr.P.C, referred by the Court under Sec 156(3) CrPC to the police thereby registered FIR under Sec 406, 420, 408, 460, 471, 384, 311, 193, 196 read with Section 120B IPC. The accused approached the High Court to quash the FIR by filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC which was dismissed.
Before the Apex Court bench, it was contended
(i) that the complaint filed does not disclose the commission of any offence;
(ii) that the complaint was only a counter blast to the civil suit filed by appellant No.1 and a criminal complaint lodged by the appellants against respondent No.2;
(iii) that the High Court overlooked the pendency of an application for bringing on record the chargesheet and for the inclusion of a prayer for quashing of the chargesheet.
Perusing the complaint, the bench observed:
“A careful understanding the complaint, the gist of which we have extracted matters would show that none of the inputs of any of the offences complained against the appellants are made out. Even if all the averments contained in the complaint are taken to be true, they have not make out any of the offences alleged against the appellants. Therefore, it was not known how an FIR was registered and a chargesheet was also filed.”
The court added that when the complaint itself disclosed nothing more than a commercial relationship which was dissolved, it is not possible to enlarge the scope of his complaint by merely adding the language used in the text of the Indian Penal Code.
“The High Court has clearly in error in overlooking the application for bringing on record the subsequent development of the filing of the chargesheet and the prayer for inclusion of the relief of quashing of the chargesheet in the original petition.. It is too late in the day to seek support from any precedents, for the proposition that if no offence is made out by a careful reading of the complaint, the complaint deserves to be quashed.”, the bench observed while allowing the appeal.
Case details
Wyeth Limited vs State of Bihar | 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 721 | CrA 1224 OF 2022 | 11 August 2022 | Justices Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian
Headnotes
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ; Section 482 – If no offence is made out by a careful reading of the complaint, the complaint deserves to be quashed – When the complaint itself disclosed nothing more than a commercial relationship which broke, it is not possible to enlarge the scope of his complaint by merely adding the language used in the text of the Indian Penal Code. (Para 15-18)